custom term papers

Archive

Archive for the ‘Samples’ Category

Sample Essay on Addictive Substances: Is the Permission a Good Idea Towards College Young Adults?

November 27th, 2017 Comments off

good idea The issue of drugs is one of the most widely spread and most frequently disputed social and health problems throughout the world. It is understood that there are different kinds of drugs. Some of them were created to help combat different types of health deviations. However, there is the dark side of this matter. Many manufacturers produce illegal drugs, which sufficiently damage human health. Moreover, there are many officially registered cases of death induced by drugs.

Nowadays, more and more countries implement the policy of drug legalization, which is utterly important for the society. Such drugs like marijuana are legal in many countries all over the globe, and the United States of America should be included in this list. However, marijuana is a light substance with soft side effects. Still, there exist other substances like cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and many others.

There are many people who think that all drugs should become legal. This would sufficiently reduce the expenses of the country because there would be no need for fighting with illegal production and selling such substances. In addition, the country will receive additional taxes. On the other hand, there is the public opinion, which is against such novelties.

Let us not forget about the great variety of adverse reactions. Some of them are severe and lead to chronic ailments or even lethal cases. This issue involves students too. This is no novelty that hundreds and thousands of students throughout a country actively consume different sorts of illegal drugs, which have negative consequences. Many countries legalize harmful substances, and you may see people taking them right in the street.

The most severe consequences can be the development of chronic diseases, addiction, severe mental complications, cardiovascular ailments and disorders, severe kidney and liver disorders, problems with potency and fertility, and even lethal cases.

There are some other preparations, which are supposed to be helpful exactly for students. They have positive effects on their learning skills. They can improve thinking, concentration, attention, memory, and some other cognitive functions, which are important for the process of learning. There are many preparations that were initiated to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Students take such drugs to get focused as well as gather strength and energy. They really claim that their academic progress has improved. Nevertheless, they give a little heed to consequences.

Such preparations have psychoactive properties and make people addictive. Undoubtedly, they lead to various mental deviations. Students suffer from sleep loss, abnormal and frequent weakness, depression, increased irritability and aggressiveness, and so on. The list is actually long, and it horrifies.

Obviously, legalization of drugs on the campus, as well as in other places, will be a huge mistake. The very first thing each state should take care of is the general well-being of its citizens. Their health should be protected. Legalization of harmful substances will do nothing but severe damage.

References:

  1. Palash, Ghosh (2010). The pros and cons of drug legalization in the U.S. http://www.ibtimes.com/pros-cons-drug-legalization-us-246712
  2. Douglas Husak and Peter de Marneffe (2005). The Legalization of Drugs: For & Against. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-legalization-of-drugs-for-against/
  3. Jeffrey, Miron (2014). Why all drugs should be legal. (Yes, even heroin.) http://theweek.com/articles/445005/why-all-drugs-should-legal-yes-even-heroin
  4. Carolina, Moreno (2012). Drug Legalization: Pros And Cons As To Its Viability As A Means To End The Drug War. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/28/drug-legalization-pros-cons-drug-war_n_1834417.html
  5. David, Boaz (1999). Drug Legalization, Criminalization, and Harm Reduction. https://www.cato.org/publications/congressional-testimony/drug-legalization-criminalization-harm-reduction
  6. Antoine, Canet (2017). Drug Legalization & Prohibition pros and cons. http://www.academia.edu/8735356/Drug_Legalization_and_Prohibition_pros_and_cons
  7. George, Will (2012). Weighing the pros and cons of drug legalization. http://www.silive.com/opinion/columns/index.ssf/2012/04/weighing_the_pros_and_cons_of.html
Categories: Samples Tags:

Sample Essay on Off-the-Books Job: Can Law Support Those Who Work Off-the-Record

November 17th, 2017 Comments off

books jobEach person requires a certain job to earn money. This is an actual necessity though this is not an obligation. Some people remain unemployed and don’t have any costs for life. Those who get education commonly find a job. However, we should talk about two kinds of jobs – official and unofficial. There are many employees who prefer or are forced to choose an off-the-books job. This kind of job has its pros and cons, and it is really vital to discuss them.

The official job has one huge benefit – you are protected by the state. You will receive all kinds of insurances, official salary, all possible bonuses, guaranteed vacation, and years of professional experience, which will be added to your pension when you retire. Of course, there are some disadvantages as well. You are forced to pay taxes, and you will have a fixed salary, which may not be high enough to satisfy your needs.

It is quite different for unreported employees. Their salary may be much higher. Why do employers pay more for the unofficial workers? The reason is the payment of taxes. They don’t have to pay for such workers and may afford to pay higher salaries. Additionally, your working hours are flexible, and you may choose when to work and which amount of work to execute. A good example of such an opportunity is the job of a freelancer. Nevertheless, one should consider some drawbacks too.

No official experience is one of them. As you aren’t officially employment, there will be no information about your working experience, which is a huge drawback in regard to the Pension Fund. Also, don’t forget about absences of social and medical security. Unreported employees will not have any insurance, such like social and medical ones. This is a big problem too. No compensation – one more thing to be thought about.  In the case of any accident or financial problem of the company where you work, you will not get any compensation. Irregular payments and work is also a popular inconvenience. You may be cheated by your employer. In this case, you will not be able to prove that you have been working for a particular period of time to be paid accordingly because you do not have any legal documents. Thus, you may work for weeks on without salary. Some people haven’t even heard of potential penalties from Internal Revenue Service (IRS). If the IRS finds that you are an off-the-book worker, the fault will be all yours. And the last but not the least important – no guarantees for the future. One day you may come to your working site and find out that you are fired without any money, compensations, and insurance.

This list clearly illustrates all possible negative consequences of the off-the-record job. You still may have some guarantees. You may ask your employer to sign an official document that you will receive at least the fixed income. Nevertheless, you will be deprived of many other essential conditions.

It is up to you whether to risk unofficial job or not. However, it is always better to be officially registered. Under such condition, you will be protected by the state and will avoid multiple troubles.

References:

  1. David Lawrence Ganz (2008). Working “Off the Books”: What to Avoid. https://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/working-off-the-books—a-guide-of-what-to-avoid
  2. Brian, Mittman (2011). Workers’ Compensation For Workers Paid Off The Books. https://thedisabilityguys.com/workers-compensation-for-workers-paid-off-the-books/
  3. Tom, Breedlove (2015). Being Paid “On the Books” Pays Off. https://www.care.com/homepay/being-paid-on-the-books-pays-off-1309131442
  4. The New York Times (2008). Immigration, Off the Books. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/opinion/17thu1.html
  5. Daniel, Levy (2017). I Was Hurt on the Job but Was Working “OFF THE BOOKS” Can I Get Workers’ Compensation?
  6. Le, Trinh (2015). How Much Trouble Are Under the Table Employees? http://blogs.findlaw.com/free_enterprise/2015/06/how-much-trouble-are-under-the-table-employees.html
  7. Lawyers.com (2017). The Employer’s Liability for Unreported Tips. https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/taxation/the-employers-liability-for-unreported-tips.html
Categories: Samples Tags:

Sample Essay on Discrimination: Kinds of Discrimination DOJ Does NOT Protect Us from

September 15th, 2017 Comments off

The issue of workplace discrimination has posed legal challenges ever since the days of the Civil Right Movement. Today, we still struggle with protecting individuals from unfair and discriminatory practices in the workplace. The article below can help you craft a strong essay on this complex topic.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the crowning achievement of the Civil Rights Movement. Lawmakers and activists fought for years to extend protections to black people who were often targeted by hate groups and Jim Crow laws which made it impossible for them to advance in the workplace as their white peers could. This legislation made it illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex or religion. Because of this legislation, employees cannot be fired because of their race or demoted because of their religious beliefs. However, there are some groups who don’t seem to fall within these protected classes: familial caregivers, military personnel, and gay or transgender individuals. In some cases, Title VII may be interpreted loosely to provide protection for these groups, or they may be protected by other legislation. But this is not always true.

Caregivers who are responsible for the needs of young children or sick spouses sometimes face discrimination in the workplace. A woman who is pregnant or the mother of young children may be passed over for a promotion in favor of men or child-free women who have the same qualifications. Employees may lose out on opportunities if they need to take time off to care for an aging parent. The Civil Rights Act does not explicitly offer protection for such situations. However, some people interpret such cases to be in the domain of gender discrimination. Individual states like Alaska and Connecticut have put laws in place to protect people from discrimination because of parenthood or familial obligations.

Another group that has faced discrimination in the workplace is military employees and veterans. In the past, if a worker was called up for active service in the military, they often found that their employers replaced them in their absence. They also faced challenges in getting hired or obtaining fair pay in the workplace. While Title VII does not provide protections for this group, the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) was signed into law in 1994. This act protects the jobs of active military personnel and removes discriminatory barriers to reemployment.

Another group that does not explicitly fall under the protection of Title VII are members of the LGBT community. Gay, bisexual, and transgender people encounter discrimination in many forms, including in the workplace. Ever since 1975, legislators and activists have tried to extend Title VII protections to this group, but all attempts have failed. While some judges interpret sex discrimination broadly to include “sexual orientation,” this is open to interpretation and isn’t specifically stated. The vulnerability of this particular group has recently become evident with President Trump’s proposed ban on transgender individuals serving in the military.

The issue of workplace discrimination is complex, especially as our culture changes. Protecting a wide variety of people from discrimination in the workplace is not easy or simple. While the spirit of the Civil Rights Act remains in force, the letter of the law still leaves many groups unprotected.

References:

Categories: Samples Tags:

Sample Essay on Immigration to America: What Makes People Give up on Their Home

September 8th, 2017 Comments off

Immigration is a complex issue, which has been controversial ever since the Pilgrims first sailed to Plymouth Rock. Many of the motivations behind immigration to the US have remained the same throughout the centuries. This article can guide you as you craft an essay on this relevant and complex topic.

The history of immigration to the United States spans hundreds of years, yet most of the reasons for the mass exodus to America have remained constant: the search for greater economic opportunity, an escape from intolerable conditions in their own countries, and the desire for political and religious freedom. Sadly, many immigrants were forced to come to the United States as slaves or indentured servants.

During the earliest wave of immigration in the 1600s, many Europeans found that the price of passage to the United States was more than they could afford. These immigrants chose to barter their freedom in exchange for a one-way ticket to the US, and became indentured servants. They earned their freedom after a four-to-seven year term of labor. Unfortunately, thousands of people from West Africa were forcibly kidnapped and brought to the US as slaves, beginning as early as 1619 and continuing until after the Civil War. While we no longer chain other humans and force them to come to the US, the modern-day equivalent still exists in undocumented migrant workers forced to work without pay.

The draw of cheap or free land and independence of resources drew thousands of immigrants during the 1600s. The period of westward expansion in the 19th century opened up more opportunities for migrants from Ireland and Germany. The California gold rush drew in both Europeans and Asians. Today, many Asians still migrate to the US to pursue opportunities in fields like research, engineering, law, and medicine which are unavailable to them in their own countries.

During the 19th century, many Irish immigrants came to America to flee the devastation of the Irish Potato Famine, in which 1.5 million Irish people died. They were not the only ones who came to America to flee terrible situations in their home countries. Overcrowding and disease in many of the cities of Europe brought people of all nationalities to seek a new life in the US. Wars and pogroms in Mexico, Turkey, and Russia brought immigrants who needed the safe haven from violence and persecution. Today, the US offers a refuge to those fleeing violence or natural disasters.

Of course, the very first immigrants were the Pilgrims, who sailed to America from Britain in 1620 seeking religious and political freedom. This desire for freedom was echoed by a later wave of immigrants: intellectuals who migrated from Europe after the failed revolutions of 1848. Today, the US still provides asylum to people in other countries who are persecuted for their religious or political beliefs.

Although much has changed throughout the history of the USA, the reasons that people come here have remained fundamentally the same. Immigrants still seek freedom, refuge and, opportunity.

References:

Categories: Samples Tags:

Sample Essay on Human Equality: Why Someone Should Work Harder

August 6th, 2017 Comments off

human-equalityEven in countries which do not legally discriminate against one particular group of people, it’s still possible to identify examples of inequality. In the United States, for instance, men are generally more likely to earn higher salaries than women, seemingly benefiting from their gender in the realm of career advancement. To understand why this occurs, it’s necessary to investigate the issue further.

According to a recent study, although American men and women express an equal desire to advance in the workplace, women are 15% less likely than men to get promoted. Although some people may assume that becoming a mother would reduce a woman’s desire to earn a promotion, the study found that women with children are actually more likely to work towards a promotion than women who aren’t mothers.

Other data can shed light on this discrepancy. Studies indicate that men generally feel confident in their ability to move up within a company or an organization. Women, when they have initially joined the workforce, still believe that earning a promotion to an executive role is a difficult process with many challenges along the way. This attitude, rooted in genuine concerns, may impact the degree to which a woman pursues career advancement. If a man feels confident about getting a promotion, he’ll make his desire known to upper management. A woman of equal qualifications, who believes that her gender will restrict her ability to advance, may be reluctant to pursue a new position aggressively.

A comprehensive study by Harvard Business School also helps to illustrate why women are passed over for promotions more frequently than men. Many people who thrive on their careers benefit from having a mentor who offers them advice. According to the study’s findings, however, there’s a clear difference between how mentors treat women and how they treat men.

Men typically receive a moderate amount of advice from their mentor. More importantly, with male employees, mentors are more likely to use their position to help an employee network with the right people. Women, on the other hand, receive too much advice from their mentors, possibly because they are viewed to be less qualified than their male counterparts. Unfortunately, mentors don’t usually exercise their influence to help women earn promotions. They supply an abundance of advice, but they don’t actually recommend them for any positions, depriving them of one of the key benefits a mentor can provide an employee.

In fact, many women involved in the study report that they have to challenge their mentor when trying to move up in an organization, whereas men generally don’t face this struggle. The mentor isn’t likely to accept that a woman is prepared for her new role.

Clearly, there is an equality gap, even if it isn’t legally-sanctioned. In the business world, women may have to work harder than their male counterparts to get noticed. In the meantime, it’s also important for companies and organizations to be aware of these disparities, so they can address them in the future.

References:

  • Bartz, C. (2014). Why Women Should Do Less & Network More. Fortune Online
  • Belanger, L. (2015). Making the Case for Women’s Career Development. Fast Company
  • Brescoll, V. (2013). Study: Men Seeking Career Advancement Are Favored for Flextime. Yale Insights
  • Hartmann, H. (2016). Women Need Equal Opportunities for Job Advancement. New York Times
  • Ibarra, H. (2010). Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women. Harvard Business Review Online
  • Lebowitz, S. (2015). A new study from Lean In and McKinsey finds exactly how much more likely men are to get promoted than women. Business Insider
  • Waller, M. (2016). How Men & Women See the Workplace Differently. Wall Street Journal
Categories: Samples Tags:

Sample Compare and Contrast Essay on Democracy and Dictatorship

August 4th, 2017 Comments off

democracy-and-dictatorshipThere are several systems of government that we can face in the nowadays world. In this article, we will get to know how to structure a compare and contrast essay, comparing dictatorship and democracy, as the most renowned systems of government.

Although there are clear differences between democracy and dictatorship on paper, recent global history has illustrated them in very clear terms. To grasp the essential differences between these two forms of government, it’s important to study the philosophical differences as well as the differences that become apparent when observing actual countries that implement these forms of government.

Essentially, a democracy is a form of government in which citizens elect representatives to govern. Technically, people don’t have the power to create, repeal, or enforce laws, but they do choose the individuals who will have that power on their behalf. Some countries are direct democracies, in which each vote is equal, and others implement voting models that weigh votes differently based on key factors like geography.

In a dictatorship, most or all of the political power is consolidated so that one individual governs the people. Dictatorships often arise after historically tumultuous periods, in which a charismatic ruler gains power via revolution or appeals to the masses.

It’s easy to identify the drawbacks of a dictatorship. When one individual has the power to govern, they can make and enforce laws that suit their own ideology, and not the ideology of the people they claim to represent. However, some people claim that allowing one person to rule ensures that government runs more smoothly and efficiently. They claim that it’s difficult to accomplish anything if the people have too much influence, simply because not all citizens of the nation agree on basic political issues. Others also point out that leaders can manipulate uneducated voters in a democracy, essentially installing a dictatorship that could not be questioned on legal grounds.

Although democracies are common throughout the world, the United States may be the most familiar example. In recent history, the fascist leadership of Adolf Hitler represents the worst consequences of a dictatorship.

It’s impossible to argue that the United States has been free of political tumult. When citizens of a geographically large country are allowed to participate in the political process, there will be significant differences of opinion that can result in a cumbersome government.

On the other hand, recent dictatorships indicate that the type of personality which is attracted to that much power is also unlikely to wield it scrupulously. Dictators often use their position to marginalize or exterminate certain ethnic groups, promote agendas which favor some citizens over others and engage in acts of aggression against other nations that don’t have the approval of the citizenry. As a result, even citizens who aren’t specifically targeted by a dictator can suffer if they’re drafted into a war they do not support. More importantly, because dictators do not earn their power through legitimate popular support, there is almost always a backlash against them. Many citizens feel that the government does not represent their interests.

At a basic, philosophical level, the differences between a democracy and dictatorship are obvious. It’s important to not merely study these differences from a theoretical perspective, though. In order to truly understand the impact they have on citizens of a country, one must study them in practice.

References:

  • Antic, M. (2004). DEMOCRACY VERSUS DICTATORSHIP: THE INFLUENCE OF POLITICAL REGIME ON GDP PER CAPITA GROWTH. EKONOMSKI PREGLED
  • BBC Staff. (2011). Democracy and Dictatorship: Key Differences. BBC
  • Cheibub, J. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, Vol. 143, 67-101.
  • Heichel, J. (2014). Democracy Vs. Dictatorship: Political Opposites. Udemy
  • Kunal, S. (2017). Democracy Versus Dictatorship? The Political Determinants of Growth Episodes. Harvard Kennedy School
  • Pande, A. (2010). Dictatorship vs. Democracy. The Huffington Post
  • Schiffbauer, M. (2010). Democracy vs. dictatorship: Comparing the evolution of economic growth under two political regimes. Economics of Transition, Vol. 18, 59-90.
Categories: Samples Tags:

Sample Essay on Ambiguity: Why Some Laws Contradict Each Other

August 2nd, 2017 Comments off

sample-essay-on-ambiguityWe can face a lot of laws that contradict each other. In this sample essay, we are going to have a look at the contradictory laws in the USA

In an ideal world, all laws would be consistent. However, this is not always the case. In some instances, laws contradict one another. Often, this happens in America when states legalize activities before the federal government does.

For example, consider marijuana laws. In some American states, it’s now legal to own and use marijuana recreationally. The federal government continues to outlaw recreational marijuana usage. Another example regards the difficulty of interpreting immigration laws, which are constantly shifting in the United States depending on political influence.

Maria Teresa Fuentes understands the consequences of this. Although she crossed the American border illegally, she filed paperwork to become a citizen, citing a law which states that illegal immigrants may be granted citizenship if they marry a legal citizen. Unfortunately, Fuentes had previously been deported from the country. Another law states that an individual who has been deported must wait for, at least, 10 years in their home country before they can begin the process of immigrating to the country legally.

There are obvious contradictions between the two laws when applied to this case. Fuentes made an attempt to earn her citizenship via legal means, adhering to the law as she understood it. Because she had been deported once before, her case was unique. In cases like this, interpretation is left to the discretion of a district attorney or judge. Sometimes these cases prompt amendments to laws, but usually, officials make a decision based on their own personal understanding of the statute.

Developments in technology can also result in contradictory laws, especially at the local municipal level. Examples of this are common in the telecommunications industry. In order to facilitate a strong cell service in a given area, providers must either erect new antenna towers or place their towers on existing tall structures. Frequently, they choose to place their antennas on apartment buildings. However, local codes may prohibit commercial, industrial, or similar facilities or developments in that particular zone. Back when the law was originally written, the local government could not have anticipated mobile phone technology.

In these cases, the proper interpretation of the code’s language is essential. Some residents of an apartment building might cite the law in order to prevent the company from installing antennas on their roof. The wireless provider must hire a skilled lawyer who can present an alternate interpretation of the language which would allow for such installations. They can generally make the argument that a wireless antenna installation does not match the definition of a commercial installation at the time the code was written.

For law students, it’s especially important to understand that there are laws on the books which seem to contradict one another. Depending on the nature of the contradiction, the laws may be amended, a judge or district attorney may be responsible for interpreting them, or a corporate lawyer may have to make their case to the local government. The law isn’t always as consistent as many would like, and it’s likely to only become more complex in the future, not less.

References:

  • Bort, R. (2017). JOHN OLIVER LAYS OUT ALARMING CONTRADICTIONS BETWEEN STATE, FEDERAL MARIJUANA LAWS. Newsweek
  • Bunn, T. (2013). Contradictory Laws. University of Richmond
  • Duant, L. (2014). State vs. Federal Law: Who Really Holds the Trump Card? The Huffington Post
  • Fernandez, V. (2011). Contradictory Immigration Laws Leave Families in Legal Limbo. New American Media
  • Grossman, A. (2014). Banks to be Allowed to do Business With Marijuana Dispensaries. Wall Street Journal
  • New York Times Staff. (2017). Understanding Transgender Access Laws. The New York Times
  • Sreenivasan, H. (2013). The Connection: Contradictory Marijuana Laws. PBS.org
Categories: Samples Tags:

Sample Essay ‘The Non-Voters: The Reasons, Impacts and Solutions’

July 24th, 2017 Comments off

The decision not to vote has as much of an impact as the choice to vote for a particular candidate. The research shows that low-income citizens and those aged 18-24 are the least likely to vote, meaning that significant segments of our population do not cast their voices for any candidates.  Some do not vote because they are too busy. Many choose not to vote because they don’t like the candidates or they feel their vote won’t make any difference. While an easier voting process might help marginally with voter turnout, the real solution seems to lie at the heart of our political system and its lack of representation of many of our citizens.

Why do so many citizens voluntarily surrender their constitutional right to vote? According to research in the last few years, the majority of non-voters are “pessimists.” They express the view that their vote won’t make any difference.  Many others say they are too busy, citing work, traveling and illnesses as major factors keeping them away from the polls. A common theme expressed among non-voters is the absence of good candidates. They just feel that there is no one worth taking the time to vote for.

We used to believe that the choice not to vote had little to no impact on elections. But now we know this is not true.  According to the analysis of the 2016 election results, only eight states and Washington DC that had actual political candidates earn more votes than the number of people who did not vote in that state. In other words, if “I Didn’t Vote” were a candidate, he or she would have won by a landslide. Statistically, non-voters are those under 30, low-income or non-white.  It has been found that low-income citizens often express the view that their vote won’t make a difference, while more affluent citizens feel more empowered and have more belief in the system. These gaps have tremendous implications for government policy concerning major issues like economic inequality, government services, and employment.

So how can we solve this problem and get more of our citizens out to vote? This is a complicated question and there appears to be no easy answer. The real solution will be complex and multifaceted.  Marginal improvement can be made by simplifying the voting process so that disenfranchised voters will not be able to find as many excuses to stay away. Even more important, the political system needs to generate candidates that are more representative of potential voters, especially of those in disenfranchised groups like low-income and youth. The best way to accomplish this is by more education on the policy positions of various candidates.

The American businessman William E. Simon once said, “”Bad politicians are sent to Washington by good people who don’t vote.”  For that reason, we must get to the heart of the deep sense of disenfranchisement affecting our non-voters and turn it around by building a political system that everyone can believe in.

REFERENCES:

Categories: Samples Tags:

10 GIF-Characteristics That Describe Law Students

July 23rd, 2017 Comments off

As a law student, you are working hard to acquire all the knowledge of the law, history, and procedure you need to excel at this demanding profession. But there are some skills that can’t be learned simply through studying. It takes some time to cultivate, practice and refine them. Here are the top 10 essential characteristics that you need to become a good lawyer.

 

 

 

 

1. Communication Skills

Your job is all about making effective arguments! To do that, you need excellent skills in speaking and writing. Don’t forget that you also need to be a good listener; attorneys have to carefully listen to all aspects of a case to make a convincing argument

 2. Analytical Thinking


Attorneys must have the ability to analyze large amounts of information and come to logical conclusions about it. Often, there will be more than one possible conclusion, so you will need to evaluate all the options carefully.

  3. Creativity

Often, lawyers need to come up with unique solutions to problems. They have to stay one step ahead of their opponents, and that requires some creative problem-solving skills as well as thinking “outside the box.”

 4. Research Skills

To win your case, you will need to do research quickly and effectively to find out the relevant information. Good research helps you understand the needs of your clients and to formulate a legal strategy that makes sense for their cases.

5. The Ability to Get Along with People

Ultimately, being a lawyer is all about acting on people’s behalf. The best attorneys develop the ability to read people (such as jurors and witnesses) and to develop relationships of trust with those they work with.

6. Commitment to Continuing Education

The legal field, like everything else, is constantly changing. The best lawyers commit to staying informed of changing trends in order to better help their clients.

7. Good Judgment

Not only will you need to make reasonable conclusions based on limited knowledge, but you will also need to analyze these judgments carefully for potential weaknesses and to understand the weaknesses in your opponent’s arguments.

8. Strategic Thought

Great lawyers always work out strategies in the best interests of their clients. At times, that may mean putting aside their original goals to fight for what is in the client’s best interest.

9. Perseverance

Do you think it takes a long time and a lot of perseverance to get your law degree? That’s good practice for the profession, in which you will often have to spend many hours working on a case to be successful.

10. Accountability

As a lawyer, you will need to be accountable not only for your own actions, but for your clients’, your firm, and other people you work with. Begin taking on accountability and responsibility now, so to be prepared for your future career.

 

As you work hard to attain your law degree, don’t forget about working to develop these essential qualities. You won’t learn them in your coursework, but you can nurture them through sustained practice and efforts.

Categories: Samples Tags:

Sample Essay on the Law Attitude to Abortion in Different States

July 23rd, 2017 Comments off

Ever since the historic Roe vs. Wade decision in 1973, the legalization of abortion has been a divisive and hotly debated issue in the USA, with public opinion split down the middle. But it might surprise you to learn what factors truly influence the opinion on this issue. While religion, race and educational level all play a small role, the sharpest difference exists based on a geographical region. This difference is most obvious when comparing the New England region (Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont) with those of the Central South (Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas).

Back in 1995, the Washington Post found an 18-point divide in public opinion between the New England and the South Central regions. Since that time, this divide has doubled, with a 35-point spread between these two regions, which still represent the highest and lowest populations of those in favor of legalized abortion. Support for legalized abortion in the South has dropped from 52 to 40 percent since 1995.

Even more telling, several of the Southern states have enacted anti-abortion laws in the last few years.  The TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider) laws have resulted in the closure of many abortion clinics in the South. In 2013, Texas passed such restrictive abortion legislation that all but six of its abortion providers were forced to close.

The statistics reveal that legislation such as this is a reflection of public opinion. A 2013 Pew Research poll found that in New England 75% of those surveyed believed that abortion should be legal in most cases, while only 40% of those surveyed in the South Central states believed this to be true. 52% of respondents in the South Central states believed abortion should be illegal in almost all cases, while only 20% of those from New England held this view.

The Pacific Coast and the Mid-Atlantic region also showed more liberal “pro-choice views”, while the MidWest and the South Atlantic regions veered more to the conservative camp. The Mountain West and the Great Lakes regions showed a far smaller divide, split almost 50/50.

Similar widening regional gaps in opinion can be found regarding other issues such as the legalization of same-sex marriage. The sharp differences, especially between the New England and South Central regions, can be at least partly explained by differences in religious beliefs, political affiliations, and social classes.

As such differences become more pronounced, it highlights the deep political division which has become the norm in American ideology. Is another American Civil War brewing? As these two regions become increasingly divided on a number of issues, it almost appears to be a possibility.

References:

Categories: Samples Tags: